In the US of A

At the beginning of last month I flew over to Orlando, Florida, with a few colleagues for the American Association of Cancer Research conference.

This is a long-overdue mishmash of my impressions of the tiny bit of the country I’ve now seen – I’ve never been to the states before so it was my first trip over the Atlantic and first immersive experience of our cousins separated from us by a common language across the pond. I’ve got some ranting to do as well. So if you’re looking for something sciencey, not this time!

I enjoyed the long flight actually; watched some films, food was fine. But we had to change at Newark and having been awake for too long already, hanging around the airport was quite dull and then the shorter flight to Orlando was hellish. I had a really bad cold at the time and anyone who’s flown with one surely knows how f*@&%$! painful it is.

The conference

An utterly overwhelmingly huge thing it was, with around 16,000 delegates – held in the Orange County Convention Centre, the second-largest in the States, according to wikipedia. The four of us in our lab plus a few other people from our building presented posters and our boss flew over just for one day (!) to give a talk. So we went to a few presentations and discussion groups but… well the sun was out most of the time ;)

I’ve never really been one for lazing in the sun, but someone lent me a couple of Sherlock Holmes stories so ended up reading these by the pool; the feeling of some warm sun and a light breeze… silky and extremely pleasant. Turned me into a bit of a sun-worshipper it has! Can also recommend A Study in Scarlet and The Sign of the Four – will have to check out some more.

Different!

The first adjustment was to the general environment; to the differing flora and fauna. Palm trees everywhere, the grass is odd (really thick, stumpy blades – obviously where it’s been cut – compared to ours); birds mostly different but still pigeons, starlings and collared doves; little lizards everywhere, which I think is brilliant but people from non-UK places were not bothered at all.

Then there’s just the scale of everything. Used to being all squished and cooped-up (cozy!) in England but their buildings are huge and far apart, because they can be.

Food

Of course, it’s the one aspect we really know about, but like just about everything else, it’s not until you experience it that you can really appreciate the difference.

It varied in quality, as it does everywhere, from expensive-and-horrific to surprisingly-cheap-but-quite-amazing.

For the most part, things were horribly over-processed, artificially coloured and sweetened and for all the work we’ve still to do here in optimising food quality with availability, it’s undoubtedly many times worse there – and we know what the consequences are.

We need this chain here in the UK but I guess we don’t really have as ready access to the ingredients. Totally fell in love with Red Lobster – great cocktails, friendly staff, tasty lobster (obviously).

Again, we’re aware the portions differ somewhat. You can’t get a small coke, it’s a litre whether you want it or not. Starters are the size of my main meal for the day – the idea of anyone sitting down for a full 3-course meal turns my stomach a bit. But again,  people clearly do and not that infrequently.

Tacky

Americans have quite a different idea of entertainment from us, in a lot of cases, it seems. We’re a bit more down-to-Earth here, we like our tradition, things that are ‘proper’ and fitting for the occasion. Perhaps it’s similar to the famous English manners, I don’t know, but American things seem plasticy and artificial. Whether it’s your restaurant or evening entertainment, it seemed the cheap-and-cheerful was far more common than anything else.

I’m sure it’s a case of going to the right places, but it wasn’t just food and such.

Seaworld

I had reservations about going to Seaworld – I don’t agree with keeping huge animals in captivity generally, I’m not a big fan of going to zoos generally (I appreciate conservation work, but seeing things pacing their enclosures, bored out of their minds, it upsets me).

I wasn’t sure about their standards or their sources but did a bit of research beforehand and was recommended to go by a few friends. I might not be in Florida again and our hotels were walking distance, plus the conference gave us money off tickets so why not. Apparently it does a lot to educate people about wildlife, I appreciate that. Let’s check it out.

The walk-through tunnels were lovely, I do like aquariums – fish are hardly very aware of their surroundings so I don’t feel quite as sorry for them (.. racist?). We wandered over to the Shamu stadium to catch thebig show, which has been changed dramatically since one of the trainers was killed – they don’t get in the water with them any more.

Overall, I enjoyed it. They are fantastic animals (I’d seen them at Bristol zoo as a kid so not my first time) and it was a good show. However…

BELIEVE!!

The over-acting by the trainers, the ridiculous Disney music, making such a huge deal out of people’s ‘dreams’ and much less about the animals themselves… the worst bit was that they kept showing a short film about a boy who loved whales, made a wooden whale tail necklace etc. and at one point they picked a girl from the audience (clearly rehearsed) and asked her what she wanted to be.

A doctor!

“Oh wow what an amazing dream, that’s fantastic. Well, I’ve got something really special for you, stand up, come down here..!” We thought she was going to get to touch a whale or something and were incredibly jealous. But then it was her onscreen with a trainer as he put one of the whale necklaces* on her. It was so very awfully cheesey, I felt quite ill.

*Of course, said necklaces were available from the shops and from wandering vendors all around the park for a small fortune.

It was a recurring theme, lots of ridiculous ‘follow your dreams!’ type crap and we were all just staring at each other with boredom/disbelief at times.

Also at the start they did… something, to get people to cheer the armed forces “of the USA and our allies in the United Kingdom and everywhere else!” – the trainers asked them and members of their families to stand up while everyone applauded. As the camera went around you could see people getting very excited, except for the actual soldiers, who looked very embarrassed.

It really amazes me that people still think what they want is applause and glory. Those who do are the ones pictured with their thumbs up next to dead bodies, the trigger-happy idiots (I knew one or two myself). The rest have experienced traumatic things and what they need is support, not cheers. You’d think people would have learned by now, but apparently not. I felt very uncomfortable surrounded by so many people whooping and cheering for the war. I have nothing personal against servicemen, but I found it pretty distasteful.

The dolphin show was possibly even worse for the cheesiness, with some unfollowable sort-of-plot around parrots and, I don’t know, maybe a princess.

The thing that annoyed me most about the park in general was lack of educational info. You had to hunt for it and when found, it was minimal. Most surprising was when a huge Andean condor flew over the crowd in the dolphin show, without warning or repeat, and I presume you had to ask the trainers at the end what it was if you wanted to know. Heard most people talking about vultures and monsters (they are rather scary). Hardly inspiring awe in nature now, is it?

I’ve got an angry comment on my youtube video – apparently I’m just not getting the ‘connection’ between the trainers and the animals. Sorry, but if you claim to be showing people how great animals are and how awesome nature can be, making big plastic sets, playing stupid music and doing set-pieces with kids just cheapens everything and brings it all back to humanity in its selfishness and over-inflated sense of importance. These creatures are magnificent and they manage to make them seem more unreal than anything else – not in a good way.

I think I’ll stop there, could whine about that for ages. But the rollercoaster was rather good fun.

Miami

After the conference we drove down to South Beach, Miami in a (massive, naturally) hire car.

It’s pretty much what you expect; lots of plasticy-pretty people, loud bars, pool parties, mostly-naked beach bums an unnatural shade of brown (or red!), ridiculously buff people running/skating around and loads of limousines.

The main thing that had my brow furrowed (probably its usual state) was the overwhelming amount of pro-surgery stuff around. Saw a lot of scary women who had been under the knife far too many times, adverts on buses for surgery clinics and probably most shocking to me, the mannequins.

Over here we sometimes have problems with window models that are ridiculously small; they’re a size 0-4 or something. There, they were… huge. But only in the chest area. Like Lara Croft huge, but moreso. Mad.

Everglades

One of my favourite parts of the whole trip, I think. Obviously an amazing ecosystem, I very much enjoyed seeing some wildlife and getting some actual snippets of education from the locals. Still somewhat for-the-tourists in the safari park, of course, but even then they did well to get a lot in and be very entertaining at the same time.

I paid my $3 to have a hold of little Snappy (left)!

We went a bit further down to the actual national park bit, where you’re more free to just wander around. Unfortunately it was so hot we had to leave after quite a short time but it was lovely to see so many baby alligators milling about in the river. It’s amazing how well-camouflaged even the huge ones are. And a little scary.

Going home

I slightly regret that we couldn’t see more of the Keys; I hired a bike and cycled around the first one, Key Biscayne, for an hour, which was lovely – especially when you can jump in the sea to cool off afterwards! Definitely should have copied Bernardo’s lobster-for-last-lunch decision, too.

On the way to Miami airport in the shuttle I ended up next to a leathery older guy wearing a Power Balance Band. It took quite a lot not to blurt out that they’re utter bollocks, but I managed it, partly out of fear that he’d throw me out of the window or something.

The flight back was somewhat uncomfortable due to sunburn (through F50!) from a day on South Beach, the usual crying children and inability to sleep. Massive Virgin Atlantic plane though, quite impressive. They give you nice things like a blanket, eye mask, toothbrush etc.! I like free things.

In summary

I don’t think I’d want to live in the States. I would still like to visit San Francisco and New York and see some of the landscapes around the country; Yosemite, Rockies, Grand Canyon, that sort of thing. Feels like it should be done. But the culture I can do without, it really ain’t my style. Although that was expected. They don’t like the heathen atheists either; I can do without that worry.

It was a nice break, interesting and one more place to add to my pitiful travel experience!!

Some random video bits:

QEDcon: Day 2

So I was going to do a couple more updates yesterday but power sockets weren’t really forthcoming so in the end I just tweeted ’til my phone died! Check out our room-mate Tom’s phonecasts for lots of exciting insights.

Marsh killing time until 10:23am!

We have just participated in the 10:23 demonstration, 2011 – we overdosed on some 31C belladonna pills (below). Sugary! Helping some with their hangovers (I think I’m on a pleasant little sugar high. Others are using the leftovers to sweeten their coffee).

Here’s a video from James, already! Edit: do see this excellent video account from Token Skeptic podcast, which has some good crowd shots, a lot of Marsh’s entertaining time-filling speech (including fantastic hatemail from homeopaths) and the big event itself.

The response to the campaign this year has been global, with people participating in some wonderfully random places (nice big Flickr set here).

An amazing achievement is that Brazil, as a direct result of the campaign, is now examining its policies on providing homeopathic treatments!

Note in particular, the individuals taking part in Antarctica (as you can see in that brilliant video above) and Hawaii!

A crowd favourite was the Spanish stunt of putting a ten23 t-shirt and hat on a statue of Samuel Hahnemann (‘founder’ of homeopathy):

I went to all of the live podcast recordings yesterday:

InKredulous (with George Hrab, Jon Ronson, Andy Wilson, Marsh and Steve Novella)

- Pod Delusion (James O’Malley, presenting Sean Ellis, Liz Lutgendorff, Dr*T, Craig Lucas and James Thomas)

- Strange Quarks (Marsh interviewed Eugenie Scott about the problems with, and possible solutions to, creationism in education – both in the US and a bit in the UK. Good Q&A afterwards – plus Eugenie is talking this afternoon).

Yesterday also featured a lot of talks on paranormal research and I’ve heard good things about those – I’ll find some links to reviews when they appear.

George Hrab entertained us after the evening dinner with his unique brand of skeptical rock, surprisingly romantic and, at times, tear-jerking (perhaps I was just overly-emotional from fatigue!).

Apparently there was some skeptical “dancing” (quotes not optional) but many of us hid in the bar as it was comfy and relatively quiet.

Wendy Grossman has just finished her ‘Policy-based evidence-making’ talk and Simon Singh is up next to talk about the Big Bang! Looking forward to the rest of the day, providing I can find some more coffee and some food. Late train back.

Edit: Simon Singh’s talk is coming to an end but he did show us a very amusing coincidence first: he’s in room 1023, without it being orchestrated! Brilliant. Also, he’s been talking about the Great Global Warming Swindle programme; I wrote about this here if you want some examples of the kind of rubbish that was in it.

So far the main in-joke is the fact that it’s constantly raining here in ‘Manchestuh’ and we’ve got to know the small stretch of road between the hostel and the hotel very well indeed, but nothing else.

-

Photos:

From Alex Davenport (I’m in a few of those, of course)

Rob’s Flickr set.

Great photos from @gammypoofle – I spy myself blogging and things in a few of them :)

Pics by Richard Cooper (including Simon’s coincidental room number!)

Links:

Paul Jenkins has another great summary of the main events – useful!

If you want know how to set up Skeptics in the Pub (a frequent search on this blog!) or related skeptical gathering, have a listen to Token Skeptic‘s recording of the SitP workshop with Marsh and Simon Perry. See also: Birmingham Skeptics.

Prof. Bruce Hood laments the brevity of the conference – we are all doing the same.

Steven Novella discusses some weird reactions of homeopaths to 10:23.

Wendy Grossman has some thoughts.

South Yorkshire skeptics on 10:23

Milton muses on homeopaths’ mild hysteria and found this great playlist of all the 10:23 videos on Youtube so far.

Dave Gamble‘s favourite tweets (yay, made the grade both days!)

Google gets it right! Edit: Oh for god’s sake. Yes it’s fake. It’s the oldest joke since Google introduced the autocomplete feature. A fake joke about a fake medicine. Lighten up. Also, Crispian’s post. Plus it’s not that different from the actual result anyway.

QEDcon: Day 1

This weekend I’ve come to Manchester, for the first time ever, to QEDcon!

It’s just kicked off and it’s all very exciting. George Hrab is our host all day and Bruce Hood has now taken the stage.

Our hostel is pretty good – I’m staying with 7 nerdy guys (aren’t they lucky!) and actually, having remembered my ear plugs, slept ok!

It’s surprisingly warm up here; every opportunity, the fact we’re in THE NORTH is mentioned. It’s also raining – we did not expect that at all.

The main hall is impressive (will put some photos up later!) but Ian has pointed out that the chandelier is flickering and now that’s all I can see. Alex has also stolen my twitter, while I ran to the bathroom, and virtually assaulted Rhys. But I am using his netbook, so fair enough I suppose.

There is also a very authentic model Dalek in the corner.

Ooh, Bruce is talking about how the public don’t trust scientists – a subject close to my heart of course. And why people have such strong tendencies to believe weird things – it’s all because of how our brains have evolved.

Hecklers! “Prove it!” – bit of an in-joke there it seems.

Anyway, I’m going to listen a bit more now. More later!

Links:

An extensive review of the day from Paul Jenkins

A “Media Tart” Case Study

I recently went to a course run by some ex-BBC journalists, Media Players International, on how to engage with the media regarding your research. They encouraged us to become the Media Tarts of the future, so here I (vaguely…) recall some of Dr Armand Leroi‘s lecture to my fellow postgrads and I from way back in the Summer, which was on that very topic.

I’ve enjoyed Armand’s telly programmes and was fortunate to have a pint and a chat with him at the very first London Skeptics in the Pub I went to (having been apprehensive about knowing no-one beforehand!).

Probably most famous for his science best-seller, Mutants, Armand has a great passion for his subject – evolutionary biology – which I very nearly pursued after university myself (and still sometimes wish I had!).

My Life As A Media Tart

Guest lecture to School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Postgradute Day.

How I became one and how you can too!

The OMIM database* shows that we are all mutants. This gives us information on development.

[*I love OMIM; Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, and have done since it was introduced to us at university. You can search any gene you can think of and see if it's been linked to a heritable disease in people, with links to the original papers, follow-up studies, details of other-organism models, big clinical studies, drugs and so on. Very useful & interesting.]

Armand recalled dealings with the “innocent of knowledge” TV people in Soho(!) when Channel 4 had commissioned a series of programmes that should cover science in the form of:

Sex, death and deformity

The Sex was provided by Olivia Judson, the Death by Gunther von Hagens [oh how I did enjoy the Body Worlds exhibition!!], and the Deformity by Armand!

He showed us a timeline of the deadlines set (and missed!) during the writing of Mutants, and its movement to TV serialisation.

Filming is wonderful! But draining.

Having worked on the flatworm C. elegans (one of biology’s favourite genetic models) for many years, Armand noted how human compassion affected the projects – studying mutants can mean ‘treating real people as flies’, with respect to their genes;

I was comfortable with worms!

We scientists are sometimes resistant to being taken out of our comfort zones!

TV is a crass medium

Apparently the BBC even has a ‘walking & talking’ school! They’ll teach you how to move and talk at the same time. Amazing.

Is it worth it?

A common question with regard to any sort of science communication endeavour, especially ones such as writing and presenting that can take a lot of time and effort. Armand replies:

There is a need for science. Lots of TV science!

The situation isn’t quite as dire as many of us tend to think. SciComms is flourishing in many ways; this is the first time in my life, at least, that it’s been cool to be nerdy! Perhaps I’ve just restricted my social bubble so much that that’s inevitable, who knows.

We need scientist-driven content.

Rather than producer-driven; otherwise you fall into the sensationalist traps, don’t actually inform anyone of anything and maintain useless stereotypes.

Prof. Kathy Sykes and notable others have started to take on alternative medicine (close to the skeptics’ hearts of course) and pseudo-skepticism such as the ‘global warming swindle’ (see below).

Science Matters.

There has been a war of sorts, going for >2300 years; if one is going to be overly-dramatic about it, involving (un)truth, light/dark and (un)reason. Perhaps embodied by Aristotle’s movement away from his teacher, Plato, saying

Plato is my friend, but the truth is more my friend.

Something with which I identify very much, in fact.

The value of Scientists in engagement

It needs to be about more than just saying “trust me, I’m a scientist”

TV is run by humanities graduates!

That may well be so, in which case the narrative tends to rank above substance.

Is it true? It is news?

It is of course important that you have a good narrative, though, otherwise people will get bored and wander off! So I wouldn’t be too quick to dismiss their skills or be particularly mean (have loads of humanities grad friends and they’re no less brilliant for it – am a firm believer in the importance of diversity. Hey, all the geneticists should agree with that!) – but it’s probably worth trying to give some input, to steer things in a more fact-based direction.

The example given was of a Channel 4 ‘documentary’ called The Great Global Warming Swindle. It was investigated by Steve Connor who said it:

was based on graphs that were distorted, mislabelled, or just plain wrong…

To which the producer Martin Durkin replied:

The original NASA data was very wiggly and we wanted the simplest line we could find

Given the audience and subject matter this is hugely irresponsible and, understandably, people made various statements against it.

Prof. Carl Wunsch at MIT, who participated in the documentary, said The Great Global Warming Swindle was ‘grossly distorted’ and ‘as close to pure propaganda as anything since World War Two’.

One of Armand’s comments during correspondence with Durkin, that ended up involving Ben Goldacre and Simon Singh as well, was affectionately dubbed the ‘Leroi Conjecture’

Left to their own devices, TV producers simply cannot be trusted to tell the truth

He finished with some advice:

Editing is unavoidable. Seriously engage and keep control. Say ‘It’s this or I walk’

Don’t be pressured into presenting something you don’t agree with or something that’s wrong. Don’t let your message be twisted.

Going back to the journalists I met on the course; apparently there’s no such thing as ‘off the record’. Get your message clear in your mind before you begin, do your best to stick to it. You can learn to direct questions yourself and maintain the agenda – they’re already skilled at doing it.

Use the Press office of your universities – fortunately at Queen Mary we have a very good one. Don’t forget that they exist.

Mythbusting

I’ve talked of it before as a potentially important role for scientists (and anyone, really) and it seems to be a growing phenomenon – that or I’m just more aware of it. All perhaps catalysed somewhat by Nick Davies.

For example, the lovely Mr Marshall, not a scientist by training, has moved into covering Bad PR (or Bad News, as a more pun-tastic title for SitP talks and wotnot) – that includes opinion polls and general PR screw-ups.

These go along the lines of:

Determine the outcome, and then run the study to find it.

It’s rather like Creation ‘science’, if you like. Here’s the conclusion, now let’s go cherry-pick that evidence.
What doesn’t fit, it’s fine – we’ll ignore it, or we’ll design a study that irons that wrinkle out.

If you venture into comms/outreach, as a media tart or otherwise, you can do your own bit in this ‘war’, if you want to call it that – science would probably appreciate it.

Armand gave us a whirlwind tour of his programmes to date:

Alien Worlds

This 2005 programme was seemingly dismissed as a bit silly; indeed we had a bit of a giggle at a screen-grab of some computer-generated space whales.

What Makes Us Human

Armand in his shades there

The programme examined the differences between the chimp (our closest relative, genetically) and human genomes and the idea of a genomic recipe.

He expanded upon one example of how genetic research has used human examples to glean information about the functions of our genes and why we develop the way we do.

In Gujarat, Pakistan, there are shrines to the Rat People;  they have unusually small heads and the mental ability of 2-3 year-old children. The local presumption is that they are cursed (or they believe that beggars or gypsies put pots on their heads to deliberately create a source of income in the family). Infertile people go to the shrine and must ‘donate’ their first child to the shrine, or all their future offspring will be doomed to this fate.

The condition is called microcephaly – a recessive genetic disorder, involving several genes, including microcephalin (involved in brain cell proliferation).

It’s fascinating because when we consider chimps vs. humans, our genes have evolved very fast; one major distinguishing feature being our ‘huge’ brains. One gene important in this feature of ours is clearly microcephalin.

He also recounted attending a very surreal dwarf conference in Reno, US., called Little People of America. Dwarfism is caused by varied bone disorders, achondroplasia being the most common, and there many people come together from all over the world to share their experiences, access support networks, meet up and make friends.

We got an amusing image of the evo bio lab’s shrine to ditto the pig (as a good luck mascot!) – animals with two faces are a striking example of mutants helping our understanding of genes; with this condition being particularly ‘entertaining’, given the gene involved (a favourite amongst us biologist/gamer types) – Sonic Hedgehog (or Shh).

Darwin’s secret notebooks

A National Geographic piece on the formation of Darwin’s thoughts. Tenuous links here being that Darwin was British and bald! They got to go on the National Geographic ship Polaris, I’m insanely jealous of this.

What Darwin Did Not Know

A programme designed to explain the development of evolutionary understanding since the publication of the Origin of Species (in just 90 minutes!! Hardly a simple task).

Armand’s favourite example from this is the Lake Malawi cichlid fish. An absolutely astounding variety of fish species have evolved in that lake and a lot of work is still going on to characterise them.

Aristotle’s Lagoon

Armand’s pet project to date, the title referring to a Lesvos Lagooon visited by “the father of biologists”, Aristotle, who wrote the Historia Animalium as a result – the first in-depth zoological study.

Interesting as the recording of the Infinite Monkey Cage I went to recently involved the question of “Is philosophy dead?” and the seemingly age-old rivalry of scientific vs. philosophical study (not that I separate them that much, personally) – here Aristotle was considered only a philosophical figure, and I thought it was a shame they’d clearly not watched this programme!

Finally I should probably plug my first foray into the world of scientific telly, brought to you by the excellent Wellcome Trust – have a look at tissue culture in our lab, here!

Fires of Russia

As you know I have a newfound fascination for the biggest country in the world.

Currently it is in the grip of a huge natural disaster; widespread wildfires. This is a fantastic set of photos by Igor Podgorny.

Our media coverage of this situation is pathetic, as this blogger points out. Many people have fled north or left the country altogether, others are staying and sitting it out; including my friend in Moscow whom I stayed with on holiday just a few weeks ago.

Having stared out to the city centre and the buildings opposite from her balcony, you could barely see them at the weekend, as she showed me over Skype. Fortunately it has mostly cleared now, hopefully permanently.

From Jen's 12th-floor Moscow flat; the towers opposite were no longer visible from the window due to the smog.

This video (also pictures below it) from Ivan Malyshev is terrifying. The family shout at each other as they try to decide what to do, eventually screaming ‘back, back! Go back!!‘ as they see they can’t move forward any more.

580 people left this village, of which this family was one. Below the video is an exerpt from a meeting between Putin and the governor of Nizhny Novgorod region, Valery Shantsev, who refuses help from the federal government saying local forces can handle the situation and it’s “under control”. I’m guessing its residents disagree.

Even once the fires calm, that won’t be the end of the trouble, as the following report explains:

After the heat and fire to our country will face new natural disasters.

In August and September in central Russia may be hit by hurricanes, tornados and torrential rains, meteorologists have warned.

According to experts, not only Central Russia is prone to this scourge, but also the left-bank Volga, parts of the Urals and North Caucasus.

The likelihood of hurricanes and storms is highest in areas where there are large bodies of water and there may be considerable temperature differences between the heated land and cooler water surface. It is suffering today from fires in the Ivanovo, Moscow, Nizhny Novgorod, Lipetsk and Tambov regions.

Much of this year’s crop is destroyed, resulting in a ban on grain exports and no doubt other produce. Face masks, air conditioning units and fans are unattainable (but no doubt on the black market by now).

My friend was even worried that the fan her parents sent her by train would be stolen and sold on for around 10,000 rubles (about £200) by the attendants. Or even that she’d be robbed on her way home.

Please share the blog linked to at the top – this is surely more newsworthy than Naomi Campbell’s latest session in the dock, whether you agree with the climate science or not (though I still don’t get why people are disagreeing… same reason people ignore other scientific findings I suppose).